Austin Film Festival 2010 Day Two. Disfunctional families are tragic and funny.

Austin Film Festival Day Two Rundown

October 22, 2010

1) Blue Valentine

2) Peep World

3) Panel Rundown

Day two was busy as all hell. I arrived downtown at around 8:40 am and didn't leave until 11:30 pm. Good times. So, here's how it went.

1) Blue Valentine (w Joey Curtis, Derek Cianfrance, Camille DeLavigne d. Derek Cianfrance)

I am going to soap box it here for a second. The MPAA (those fine folk who decide what rating a film will receive) piss me off to no end. Their system feels arbitrary, outdated, and stupid. You can only use the word "fuck" once in the non literal sense and maintain a PG-13 rating. Because that's the problem, kids hearing the "f" word too many times. For want of any other description, it is fucking stupid (I realize this review is now rated "R" and I am ok with that).

Why do I bring this up? Well, because the film I watched tonight, a powerful and incredibly touching film has been assigned an NC-17 rating for a sex scene that is not erotic, not violent, not disturbing. It is graphic, but more that that it is sad. Really sad. I'll talk more about this later, but the idea that we have a system that gives "The Human Centipede," "Hostel 1&2" and all of the "Saw" movies an R rating without a second thought gives this film an NC-17 stuns me. I honestly cannot make sense of it. This is a beautiful, touching, and wonderfully authentic film that deserves a shot at release. There is no logical way a reasonable human being could say that this is less appropriate for a teenager than any of those listed above. For some reason we think graphic torture is fine, but sex and nudity will be the downfall of us all.

Soapbox off.

My favorite poem is T.S. Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock." I've always identified with it and I think it is one of the finest pieces of writing ever produced. Specifically I am enamored with the line, "Shall I, after tea and cake and ices have the strength to force the situation to its crisis." This describes a situation most of us have been in. You're in a relationship that is failing, you know it's failing, the other person knows, your friends know, but it just hasn't reached that crisis point that forces it to end. That is what this film is about.

Most films center on the beginnings of a relationship (the honeymoon), the middle (where things have reached a comfort point), or the divorce proceedings. You never get the moment when the relationship dies. It's hard to present well and it's difficult to watch. We've all been there and it is painful.

If you think of a relationship as having a life then Blue Valentine is that life at the moment of death where the life that is dying flashes in front of your eyes. There is a combination of present time and flashback showing how these two people came together and how the inevitably fell apart.

Gossling and Williams are both superb in this film. He plays all the clumsy sweetness and frustration of Dean perfectly, and she plays the damage and need to be loved with a quiet power that is absent from most performances today.

These are two people with a very idealized and romanticized view of love. They view it as something that is there or it isn't. From their backgrounds it is obvious why. Neither of them has any exposure to a couple working at it, tending to the relationship. Things are good, then they aren't. Williams character says early on, "How can you trust your feelings when they can just disappear like that?" That is a question that has plagued people as long as there have been relationships. At some point your feelings will change and if you are unequipped to change and grow with them, then any relationship is destined to fail.

The two stories (falling in love and falling apart) are told in intersecting circles. You see the beginning of the end, then you see how they meet, you see the relationship deteriorate further, then you see their amazing first date. This style allows you to see how they fell in love with each other, but also showed the lack of foundation the ultimately doomed them. Through most of the film it is obvious that the only reason they stayed together as long as they did is because of their daughter, and their absolute love for her.

Gosling as the devoted, hard working father is touching, Williams as the overworked mother who seems to be raising her husband along with her daughter is touching. The dynamic of goofy, doting father, and concerned, loving mother is brilliantly played, and creates some genuinely sweet and heartbreaking moments.

This is not an easy movie to watch. It's quite brutal, emotionally, at times. The scene that earned the NC-17 is quite graphic. The two go away to a romantic hotel for a night to try and rediscover something, and end up in a graphic sex scene that is just hard to watch. It's not as graphic as say "Monsters Ball," but there is a resistance by Williams, followed by a resignation, she doesn't want to, but she'll do it. It isn't violent, it isn't a glamorized rape scene, it's hard to watch because it's just so sad. There is no way to deny that this is the death of the relationship embodied in a single moment. He is still infatuated with her, but she has moved on and there isn't any of the old spark left.

While I did enjoy this film it is most definitely not something I would watch often. It is good enough to deserve another view or two, but it is just to heartbreaking. This script went through 66 drafts over 12 years and it shows in the attention to detail, the brilliant pacing, and the way it allows a look and silence to speak volumes. This is a well acted, solidly written and directed film that is well worth at least one viewing, just be aware that it won't be an entirely pleasant experience.

2) Peep World (w. Peter Himmelstein d. Barry W. Blaustein)

Family centered movies are a double edged sword. Sure, everyone can relate to the idea of "family," but can they relate to the one you created. This goes for comedy and drama equally. If you go too realistic you run the risk of limiting the ability of people to relate, too simple people won't buy it, too unrealistic and it's... well, unrealistic.

"Peep World," pulls off the job of creating a believable family with relatable aspects that is completely unlike the family of anyone you know. Basically the father doesn't really care for his kids, they know it, but they fight for his approval.

Jack the oldest (Michael C. Hall in a solid performance) plays the oldest. His marriage is in trouble, his business is failing, and he has no mooring lines to keep him in place. Next is Joel (Rainn Wilson, who is brilliantly restrained) is the family fuck up. He fails at everything and nobody really takes him seriously. Next is Cheri (Sarah Silverman in a somewhat familiar role that she manages to make fresh and enjoyable) is the flaky daughter who can't really find her place. And Nathan, the youngest (Ben Schwartz who plays the hell out of this arrogant prick) who has a best selling book that is so literally based on the family that he is being sued by his sister, all gather together for their father's birthday.

This feels very much like an LA version of "The Royal Tennenbaums." Everything is amped up. The relationships are more strained, the father is outright hostile and dismissive towards his children. You really get the feeling that this is a group of people who only associate with one another out of a sense of genetic obligation, who no longer really like one another, but who obviously love each other.

Peep World ultimately succeeds at what it sets out to do. It shows a comic portrait of a HIGHLY dysfunctional family that is having a very bad day. The humor works and the performances are solid. All in all, this was a very good film.

3) Panels- It's really late and I don't really feel like transcribing my notes, so I might do that another time. But here is my rundown.

I attended

Writing RX- How to deal with being blocked

Writers and Directors- Featuring Randall Wallace, John Lee Hancock, Shane Black, Phil Rosenthal, and Alex Smith.

A Conversation with Phil Rosenthal

Film Critics in the Industry

Phil Rosenthal was without question the highlight. I'm putting all the thugs on notice. I will be pimping "Exporting Raymond" really hard until everyone has seen it.


Play this podcast on Podbean App